Administrative Efficiency and Governance: An Approach to the Ecuadorian Case

Authors

  • Bryan David Díaz Alava Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56124/aula24.v7i1.003

Keywords:

Control, Responsibility, Transparency, Corruption

Abstract

The document highlights the importance of public administration as a key tool for the Ecuadorian state to promote collective well-being and sustainable development. Since the 2008 Constitution, fundamental principles such as efficiency, transparency, and accountability have been established. However, recurring issues like corruption, politicization of processes, and a lack of technical and human resources have weakened the effective implementation of these legal guidelines. The legal framework includes essential instruments such as the Organic Administrative Code (COA), aimed at regulating the relationship between the state and its citizens under principles of transparency and efficiency; the Comprehensive Organic Penal Code (COIP), which penalizes corruption-related crimes in public administration; and the Organic Law of Public Service (LOSEP), which sets standards for professionalism and ethics in public service. Nevertheless, the implementation of these frameworks faces obstacles such as the appointment of officials based on political interests rather than merit, resource mismanagement, and a lack of institutional commitment. The document also emphasizes internal and external control mechanisms, like the Comptroller General of the State, which aim to ensure proper management of public resources, though these bodies are not exempt from political influence and structural deficiencies. Furthermore, systemic problems such as a high perception of corruption, administrative inefficiency, and a lack of technological and infrastructural resources undermine the quality of public services. Finally, the document proposes improvement strategies, including the use of digital technologies to enhance real-time monitoring and transparency, the promotion of citizen participation through social oversight and observatories, the professionalization of public service through merit-based selection and ongoing training, and granting greater autonomy to oversight bodies. These measures aim to strengthen accountability, transparency, and efficiency in public administration to overcome the current challenges and better serve citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera Robles, R. M., Cedeño Cevallos2, D. V., Zambrano Rodríguez, H. Y., & Tumbaco Tumbaco, A. A. (2024). LA GESTIÓN PÚBLICA DESDE EL ENFOQUE DE LA APLICACIÓN DE NORMATIVAS EN EL ECUADOR. Ciencia y Desarrollo. Universidad Alas Peruanas, 3.

Asamblea Nacional. (12 de junio de 2002). Ley Orgánica de la Contraloría General del Estado. Obtenido de Contraloría General del Estado: https://www.contraloria.gob.ec/WFDescarga.aspx?id=2207&tipo=tradoc

Asamblea Nacional. (2008). Constitución ecuatoriana del 2008. Montecristi, Manabí, Ecuador.

Asamblea Nacional. (6 de octubre de 2010). LEY ORGÁNICA DE SERVICIO PÚBLICO LOSEP. Obtenido de Organization of American States: https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic5_ecu_ane_mdt_4.3_ley_org_ser_p%C3%BAb.pdf

Asamblea Nacional. (10 de Febrero de 2014). Ministerio de Defensa Nacional del Ecuador. Obtenido de Código Orgánico Integral Penal COIP: https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf

Asamblea Nacional. (7 de julio de 2017). Defensoría Pública del Ecuador. Obtenido de Defensoría Pública del Ecuador: https://biblioteca.defensoria.gob.ec/handle/37000/3362

Banco sesna México. (s.f.). Mediciones internacionales . Obtenido de Banco sesna México website: https://banco.sesna.gob.mx/mediciones-internacionales/#:~:text=Informe%20Mundial%202021-,%C3%8Dndice%20de%20Percepci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20Corrupci%C3%B3n%202021,a%20100%20(sin%20corrupci%C3%B3n).

Banxico México. (s.f.). Definición de escasez . Obtenido de Banxico México: https://educa.banxico.org.mx/yo-y-la-economia/economia/1/#:~:text=La%20escasez%20es%20un%20fen%C3%B3meno,todos%20nuestros%20deseos%20y%20necesidades.

Carillo, J. L. (2006). Motivación de las decisiones de la administración pública en la legislación ecuatoriana. Obtenido de Repositorio UASB: https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/822/1/T460-MDE-Guevara-Motivaci%C3%B3n%20de%20las%20decisiones%20de%20la%20administraci%C3%B3n%20p%C3%BAblica%20en%20la%20legislaci%C3%B3n%20ecuatoriana.pdf

Datos macro. (2023). Ecuador - Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción. Obtenido de Datos macro: https://datosmacro.expansion.com/estado/indice-percepcion-corrupcion/ecuador

Guerra, J. S. (2020). CAMBIOS EN LA ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA Y SU IMPACTO EN EL SISTEMA DE CONTROL EN EL ECUADOR. Economía y Negocios UTE, 18.

Guerrero, M. Á. (2023). Administración pública en el Ecuador, su paradigma en situaciones de emergencia y riesgo. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de México, 10.

Moncayo, J. C. (2022). La administración pública en Ecuador.Elconflicto de intereses desde superspectiva actual. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. , 8.

Pérez-Yauli, V. L. (2022). El alcance del derecho a la buena administración pública en la legislación ecuatoriana. Iustitia Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas, 3.

RAE. (s.f.). Definición de corrupción. Obtenido de RAE web site : https://dle.rae.es/corrupci%C3%B3n

RAE. (s.f.). Definición de politizar. Obtenido de RAE website : https://dle.rae.es/politizar

Published

2025-02-13