LAW FROM RIGHTS, NEW SOURCE AND CREATION IN COURT
Keywords:
Rights, Justice, Constitutional Justice, manipulative sentences, Constitutional StateAbstract
The history of law is intimately linked to human beings and their rights, so investigating the sources of law is to get involved with the nature condition of the human being, and from that derives their dignity. The living right, the one in which its condition of abstraction exceeds the same guidelines of its primary origin, is exceeded by the time its latest creation arises from rights. The primary normative source warns us of an insurmountable element, that is, that the Constitutional States are eminently recognizing and guaranteeing rights, and it could not be otherwise since it is the citizens who decide to build them and it is they who give these regulations constitutional, from this justice is propped up, understood as the effective enjoyment of equal rights. This is the historical framework and condition description of this research that makes us explore the need to go critically seeking legal studies, rethinking law, warning parallel forms of justice justified by its historical condition, faced with a new creative source of law incorporating constitutional justice, and building an ideology of rights. Legal dogmatic demands it. From this jurisdiction, interpretative or manipulative sentences arise, all of them atypical, additive as long as they enter the domain of the legislator.
Keywords: Rights, Justice, Constitutional Justice, manipulative sentences, Constitutional State.
Downloads
References
Argudo Nevárez, Eduardo. La Acción Extraordinaria de Protección, el Sumak Kawsay y el neoconstitucionalismo. 500 vols. Guayaquil: argudoabogados, 2014.
Beltran De Felipe, Miguel y Gonzalez, Julio. Sentencias básicas del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos de América. Madrid: CEPC, BOE, 2005.
Carbonell, Miguel. «Recensiones, Gustavo Zagrevelsky, Juez Consitucional.» Estudios Constituionales Año 6, No. 2 (2008): 561-565.
Caso la Cocha, sentencia 113-14-SEP-CC. CASO N.o 0731-10-EP (Corte Constitucional del Eccuador, 30 de julio de 2014).
Ecuador, Asamblea Constituyente de la República del. «Constitución de la República del Ecuador.» Norma Constititucional. Quito: Registro Oficial, 20 de octubre de 2008.
Ecuador, Corte Constitucional del. Sentencia No. 008-13-SCN-CC, casos N.0 0033-09-CN y otros. Quito, 2013.
Figueroa Gutarra, Edwin. «Nedoconstitucionalismo e interpretación constitucional, Hacía nuevos horizontes en el derecho?» Revista Jurídica del Perú, 2010: 43-57.
Ocando, Humberto: Avila, Flor: Martínez de Correa, Flor. «Principios axiológicos del juez en el estado social de derecho y de justicia.» Editado por Universidad ae Zulia. Frónesis 18, nº 3 (2011).
Penhalvel, Leonardo. El Juez del Código Civil y Clomercial de la nación Argentina, Luces y Sombras. Rosario, 2017.
Ross, Alf. El Concepto de validéz y el conflicto entre el positivismo jurídico y el derecho natural. Mexico, 1991.
Sanchez Rubio, David. «Repensar los Derechos Humanos. De la Anestesia a la Sinestessia.» Tapa Blanda (Spanish Edition), 2009.
Sentencia. 13-0196 (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, Sala Constitucional, 8 de marzo de 2013).
Stone-Sweet. Governing with judges:Constitutional politics en Europe. Oxford: University Press, 2000.
Trabajo, Organización Internacional del. «Convenio 169.» Informativa. Ginebra, 27 de junio de 1989.
Zagravelsky, Gustavo. Derecho Ductil. Madrid: Trotta, 1995.
