Experimental evaluation of an adaptive hybrid architecture for Blockchain based digital identity management

Authors

  • Luis Eduardo Chichanda Garcia Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria De Manabí Manuel Félix López ESPAM
  • Jorge Roberto Loayza Zambrano Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria De Manabí Manuel Félix López ESPAM
  • Aura Dolores Zambrano Rendon Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria De Manabí Manuel Félix López ESPAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56124/encriptar.v9i17.011

Keywords:

digital identity, hybrid architecture, Blockchain, energy efficiency, distributed systems

Abstract

The management of digital identities unfolds in a context of persistent tension between security, performance, and energy consumption, particularly when centralized architectures are compared with blockchain-based approaches. In this setting, the present study introduces and evaluates an adaptive hybrid architectural model that integrates centralized and decentralized processing and switches dynamically according to system load, risk level, and operational criticality. The research is structured as an applied, quantitative study with a comparative experimental design, in which three functionally equivalent environments, namely centralized, decentralized, and hybrid, were implemented, and tests were conducted using 500 digital identities under five concurrency levels (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 requests). Latency, CPU utilization, energy consumption, and a computational energy efficiency metric (EPR), expressed in Wh per transaction, were systematically recorded. The results show that the hybrid model maintains global latency and EPR values that are very close to those of the centralized architecture, whereas the decentralized architecture generally exhibits higher energy consumption per transaction and greater CPU demand, even though its EPR improves under extreme load scenarios. Overall, the findings support the view that adaptive hybrid architectures can balance traceability and efficiency and emerge as a viable alternative for digital identity systems operating under variable loads and computational sustainability constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appenzeller, A., Leitner, M., Philipp, P., Krempel, E., & Beyerer, J. (2022). Privacy and Utility of Private Synthetic Data for Medical Data Analyses. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312320

Bulgakov, A. L., Aleshina, A. V., Smirnov, S. D., Demidov, A. D., Milyutin, M. A., & Xin, Y. (2024). Scalability and Security in Blockchain Networks: Evaluation of Sharding Algorithms and Prospects for Decentralized Data Storage. Matematics, 12(23), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12233860

Chen, X., Li, S., & Li, M. (2025). A hybrid centralized-decentralized traffic control framework for unmanned aerial vehicles in urban low-altitude airspace. Communications in Transportation Research, 5(January), 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100195

Goel, A., & Rahulamathavan, Y. (2025). A Comparative Survey of Centralised and Decentralised Identity Management Systems: Analysing Scalability, Security, and Feasibility. Future Internet, 17(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17010001

Islam, S, Apu, K. U. (2024). Decentralized Vs. Centralized Database Solutions in Blockchain: Advantages, Challenges, and Use Cases. Global Mainstream Journal of Innovation, Engineering & Emerging Technology, 3(4), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.62304/jieet.v3i04.195

Katikaridis, D., Benos, L., Busato, P., Kateris, D., Papageorgiou, E., Karras, G., & Bochtis, D. (2025). Experimental Comparative Analysis of Centralized vs . Decentralized Coordination of Aerial – Ground Robotic Teams for Agricultural Operations. Robotics, 14(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics14090119

Le, H. V. A., Nguyen, Q. D. N., Tadashi, N., & Tran, T. H. (2025). Blockchain-Based Decentralized Identity Management System with AI and Merkle Trees. Computers, 14(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070289

León Torres, L. M., Jarrín Rivadeneira, E. P., Muñoz González, S. P., Suarez Galarza, M. B., & León Torres, M. G. (2025). Metodologías Ágiles en la Gestión de Proyectos de Infraestructura: Retos y Oportunidades. In Revista Veritas de Difusão Científica (Vol. 5, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.61616/rvdc.v5i3.314

Schmidt, A. A. (2025). A Comparative Study of Centralized vs . Decentralized AI Architectures in Smart Supply Chain Management. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5257269

Ul, B., Khan, I., Malaya, U., Lumpur, K., Padang, U. N., Barat, S., Goh, K. W., Technology, I., Zuhairi, M. F., Lumpur, U. K., Putra, R. R., Teknik, F., Padang, U. N., Barat, S., Khan, A. R., Arabia, S., Chaimanee, M., & Thani, P. (2024). A Scalability Enhancement Scheme for Ethereum Blockchains : A Graph-based Decentralized Approach. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res, 14(6), 17725–17736. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8465

Urblik, L., Kajati, E., & Papcun, P. (2023). A Modular Framework for Data Processing at the Edge : Design and Implementation. Sensors, 23(17), 7662. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177662

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Chichanda Garcia, L. E. ., Loayza Zambrano, J. R. ., & Zambrano Rendon, A. D. . (2026). Experimental evaluation of an adaptive hybrid architecture for Blockchain based digital identity management. Scientific Journal of Informatics ENCRYPT - ISSN: 2737-6389., 9(17), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.56124/encriptar.v9i17.011