Structural Comparison of Performance Point Using Pushover Method for Three Different Structure Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56124/finibus.v8i15.001

Keywords:

structural systems, performance, ductility, earthquake resistance, pushover

Abstract

The objective of this research is to compare the structure at the point of performance using the Pushover method to three structural systems designed for an 8-story reinforced concrete building. It was carried out through documentary, applied and descriptive research, emphasizing the collection and information of theoretical data for a non-linear static analysis of structures. The main results of the analysis demonstrate that the performance and ductility point of the three seismic structure systems through Pushover analysis must meet the acceptability criteria through the structural capacity curve of the building. It is concluded that the scope of this research is developed to demonstrate structural performance and ductility by nonlinear static analysis using the Etabs program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACI Committee 318. (2014). ACI 318S-14: Requisitos de Reglamento para Concreto Estructural. American Concrete Institute. 2da Edición. ISBN: 978-0-87031-964-8.

Aguiar, R., Mora, D., & Rodríguez, M. (2015). Diagrama momento-curvatura y momento-rotación para elementos de hormigón armado y acero con ASCE/SEI 41 y sistema de computación CEINCI-LAB. Revista CIENCIA 17(2). https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/ciencia/article/view/520

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2017). ASCE/SEI 41-17: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ISBN 9780784480816. https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=LCCN&searchArg=2017047777&searchType=1&permalink=y

Crisafulli, F. (2018). Diseño sismorresistente de construcciones de acero. 5ta Edición. Asociación Latinoamericana de Acero (Alacero). Mendoza, Argentina.

Cueto, J. (2024). Caracterización del comportamiento estructural de sistemas combinados de concreto reforzado en Colombia a través de análisis no lineal estático [Tesis de posgrado. Universidad del Norte]. http://hdl.handle.net/10584/12017

Deierlein, G., Reinhorn, A., & Willford, M. (2010). Nonlinear Structural Analysis for Seismic Design. A Guide for Practicing Engineers. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Disponible en: https://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/nistgcr10-917-5.pdf

Gaxiola-Camacho, J. (2022). Diseño sísmico basado en desempeño revisión de una filosofía alternativa de diseño. XXIII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Sísmica. Juriquilla, Querétaro https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361040717

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. 6ta Edición. McGraw Hill España. ISBN: 978-1-4562-2396-0

Mander, J., Priestley, M., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering. 114(8) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

Muñoz-Martín., A & de Vicente, G. (2010). Análisis de esfuerzos tectónicos Fallas y sismos. Reduca (Geología). Serie Tectónica., 2(6). Disponible en: https://www.revistareduca.es/index.php/reduca-geologia/article/view/173

Moehle, J. (2015). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. McGraw-Hill Education ISBN: 9780071839440.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2017). Recommended modeling parameters and acceptance criteria for nonlinear analysis in support of seismic evaluation, retrofit, and design. Applied Technology Council. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.GCR.17-917-45

Padilla, J. (2023). Evaluación consistente con la amenaza del desempeño sísmico de pórticos intermedios diseñados de acuerdo con ACI 318-19 [Tesis de postgrado. Universidad del Norte]. http://hdl.handle.net/10584/11366

Vargas, Y. (2023). Análisis estructural estático y dinámico probabilista de edificios de hormigón armado. Aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones a la evaluación del daño. [Tesis doctoral, UPC, Departament d'Enginyeria del Terreny, Cartogràfica i Geofísica]. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/dissertation-2117-94966

Published

2025-01-24

How to Cite

Ulcuang- Cabascango, J. E., & Villavicencio-Cedeño, E. G. (2025). Structural Comparison of Performance Point Using Pushover Method for Three Different Structure Systems. Revista Científica Y Arbitrada Del Observatorio Territorial, Artes Y Arquitectura: FINIBUS - ISSN: 2737-6451., 8(15), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56124/finibus.v8i15.001