Viruela símica: percepción de riesgo de pandemia en Centroamérica
Miguel Gallegos
ORCI: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-7833
Correo: maypsi@yahoo.com.ar
Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Rosario, Argentina
Mauricio Cervigni
Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Rosario, Argentina
Anastasia Razumovskiy
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8653-7479
Arizona College of Nursing
Florida, USA
Melissa L. Morgan
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-6763
University of California Santa Barbara, California.
Santa Barbara, USA
Nelson Portillo
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7628-2786
Universidad Nacional de Rosario,
Argentina
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-7570
Lima, Perú
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-2332
Universidad Norbert Winner
Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador
Pedronel González Rodríguez
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-4039
Universidad Jesús de Nazareth
San Pedro Sula, Honduras.
Wendy Matute Rivera
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-5038
Universidad Jesús de Nazareth.
San Pedro Sula, Honduras
Ana María Florez
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-5202
Asociación Panameña de Psicólogos
Panamá
Ibeth Vergara Jaen
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-1560
Universidad Latina de Panamá,
Pablo Martino
ORCI: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-2050
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Rosario, Argentina
Recibido: 13/09/2024 – Aceptado: 01/10/2024 – Publicado: 16/12 /2024
Resumen
Objetivo: Se presentan datos sobre la percepción de riesgo de pandemia por el brote de viruela símica en Centroamérica. Materiales y Métodos: Se utilizó una sola pregunta: ¿En qué medida considera que la viruela del simio podría convertirse en la próxima pandemia? La encuesta se administró entre el 8 y el 22 de julio de 2022. Resultados: Los datos indican que existe una baja percepción de riesgo en la población encuestada, solo entre el 22,7 % y 31,1 % de la muestra considera que la viruela símica podría convertirse en la próxima pandemia. Conclusiones: Estos datos deberían servir para orientar las acciones de alfabetización de enfermedades y establecer medidas gubernamentales de preparación y respuesta.
Palabras clave: viruela símica; salud pública; epidemiología.
Monkeypox: perception of pandemic risk in Central America
Abstract
Objective: Data are presented on the perception of pandemic risk due to the outbreak of monkeypox cases in Central America. Materials and Methods: A single question was used: To what extent do you consider that monkeypox could become the next pandemic? The survey was administered between July 8 and July 22, 2022. Results: The data indicate that there is a low perception of risk in the surveyed population, with only 22.7% to 31.1% of the sample believing that Monkeypox could become the next pandemic. Conclusions: These data should serve to guide disease literacy actions and establish government preparedness and response measures.
Keywords: monkeypox; public health; epidemiology.
Viruela del simio: percepción del riesgo de pandemia en Centroamérica
Resumen
Objetivo: Se presentan datos sobre la percepción del riesgo de pandemia por el brote de casos de viruela del simio en Centroamérica. Materiales y métodos: Se utilizó una sola pregunta: ¿En qué medida considera usted que la viruela del simio podría convertirse en la próxima pandemia? La encuesta se aplicó entre el 8 y el 22 de julio de 2022. Resultados: Los datos indican que existe una baja percepción de riesgo en la población encuestada, ya que solo entre el 22,7% y el 31,1% de la muestra cree que la viruela del simio podría convertirse en la próxima pandemia. Conclusiones: Estos datos deben servir para orientar las acciones de alfabetización sobre la enfermedad y establecer medidas de preparación y respuesta de los gobiernos.
Palabras clave: viruela del simio; salud pública; epidemiología.
Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO), on July 23, 2022, indicated that monkeypox disease constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), due to the fact that more than 16,000 cases had been detected in more than 75 countries, with 5 deaths (Gallegos et al., 2022a; Kozlov, 2022). In a short time, the spread of new infections has expanded to many countries where monkeypox was not endemic. It is a zoonotic virus first detected in humans in the 1970s in Africa, although its existence in laboratory monkeys had been recognized as early as 1958 (Cohen, 2022; Kozlov, 2022). In the last two decades, local outbreaks were detected in different cities such as the United States in 2003, Sudan in 2005, the United Kingdom in 2018 and 2019, Israel in 2018, and Singapore in 2019, among others (Nakazawa et al., 2013; Simpson et al., 2020).
Transmission of monkeypox can occur through contact with body fluids, blood, skin lesions, respiratory droplets from infected animals or people, and also through contaminated objects and clothing (Altindis, Puca, & Shapo, 2022; Walter & Malani, 2022). The spread of infection has been predominantly among men, and particularly in men who have sex with men. Common symptoms include fever, headache, muscle aches, fatigue and swollen lymph nodes. Visible rashes develop on the face and body, which may heal in several weeks. Several antiviral medications have been developed (Velavan & Meyer, 2022), although many are in the experimental phase, and some vaccines are also available, but have not been widely applied. Treatment is focused on the common symptoms, except in severe cases or in at-risk persons who may require antiviral treatment (Osterholm & Gellin, 2022; Rizk et al., 2022). For the time being, low mortality is reported, and people are recovering normally after several weeks, however, there have been some deaths from severe cases (Menezes & Miranda, 2022).
Unfortunately, this new public health emergency overlaps with the COVID-19 pandemic that began in March 2020 and is still ongoing with significant consequences for human health (Gallegos et al., 2020; Gallegos et al., 2022c; Gallegos et al., 2022d: Hemati et al., 2022). Although it has been noted that the spread of monkeypox infections is much less than that reported for COVID-19 (Kozlov, 2022), it still poses a challenge to national public health systems and international health coordination, adding an extra burden of concern. Therefore, this paper presents preliminary results on the perception of the severity of monkeypox among people in three Central American countries. In the Central American region, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala and Panama have already confirmed cases of monkeypox, according to follow-up data from the Pan American Health Organization as of October 3, 2022. Although the prevalence for Central America is currently low (66 confirmed cases), the United States, Canada, and Mexico have already recognized 28,699 confirmed cases. It is therefore crucial that policy makers in these countries are well informed and prepared for the potential increase in monkeypox cases.
Materials and methods
We surveyed 1969 adults from El Salvador (n = 830), Honduras (n = 723) and Panama (n = 416) with an average age of 34.9 years (SD = 13.1), where 724 were male, 1239 were female and 6 persons did not report their sex. To collect information on the perception of risk for monkeypox, a single question was used: To what extent do you consider that monkeypox could become the next pandemic? Response options were as follows: I do not know about the virus = 0; Disagree = 1; Neither agree nor disagree = 2; Agree = 3. This single question was created ad hoc for a much larger study analyzing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America and the Caribbean.
The survey was administered between July 8 and July 22, 2022, prior to the declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization. The data collection procedure was similar in all countries. An online questionnaire was used and distributed through different social networks. Participation in the study was voluntary and there was no reward or financial compensation of any kind. The study followed the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Privada del Norte, Perú (registration number: 20223012).
Results
Table 1 shows the results of this survey conducted between July 8 and July 22, 2022, prior to the declaration of PHEIC (Gallegos et al., 2022a). As can be seen, the results indicate that between 22.7% and 31.1% of the sample believe that monkeypox could become the next pandemic. Strikingly, a sizeable percentage of people reported not knowing about this new virus, particularly in Honduras (27.4%).
Table 1
Perceived risk of monkeypox pandemic in Central America |
||||||||||
|
¿To what extent do you consider that monkeypox could become the next pandemic? |
|
||||||||
Country |
I do not know about the virus |
Disagree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Agree |
Total |
|||||
|
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
n |
% |
El Salvador |
162 |
19.5 |
163 |
19.7 |
247 |
29.7 |
258 |
31.1 |
830 |
100.0 |
Honduras |
198 |
27.4 |
141 |
19.5 |
214 |
29.5 |
170 |
23.6 |
723 |
100.0 |
Panama |
41 |
9.9 |
157 |
37.8 |
123 |
29.6 |
95 |
22.7 |
416 |
100.0 |
Discussion
The percentage of lack of knowledge is in relation to another study carried out in Europe where it was indicated that the state of knowledge about the disease was quite unsatisfactory (Riccò et al., 2022). Lack of knowledge is one of the current challenges that may contribute to increased severity of the disease (Alsanafi, Al-Mahzoum, & Sallam, 2022). Although the case fatality rate of the disease is low, the percentage of unawareness, together with the percentage of people who disagree that "monkeypox" may become the next pandemic (ranging from 19.5% to 37.8%), would suggest that the substantial riskiness of the disease may be being overlooked, compared with others such as COVID-19. Despite the emotional burden of even the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of a potentially serious new disease was not associated with the perception of serious consequences.
It should be remembered that these data were collected prior to the declaration of PHEIC, which may vary the future opinions of participants. Nevertheless, the dissemination of these preliminary data may serve to draw attention to the importance of more information and better communication about this new disease. It may also serve to encourage governments to strengthen preparedness and response mechanisms in the face of this new international public health threat (Hemati et al., 2022). Lack of adequate understanding of monkeypox and its characteristics could undermine the development of preventive measures, including potential immunization against the disease. In addition, failure to act in a timely manner, with preventive measures, could lead to synergy between pandemics.
References
Alsanafi, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., & Sallam, M. (2022). Monkeypox knowledge and confidence in diagnosis and management with evaluation of emerging virus infection conspiracies among health professionals in Kuwait. Pathogens, 11(9), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11090994
Altindis, M., Puca, E., & Shapo, L. (2022). Diagnosis of monkeypox virus – An overview. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 50(102459), 102459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102459
Cohen J. (2022). Monkeypox outbreak questions intensify as cases soar. Science, 376(6596), 902–903. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add1583
Gallegos, M., Zalaquett, C., Luna Sánchez, S. E., Mazo-Zea, R., Ortiz-Torres, B., Penagos-Corzo, J. C., Portillo, N., Torres Fernández, I., Urzúa, A., Morgan Consoli, M., Polanco, F. A., Florez, A. M., & Lopes Miranda, R. (2020). Cómo afrontar la pandemia del Coronavirus (Covid-19) en las Américas: recomendaciones y líneas de acción sobre salud mental. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 54(1), e1304. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v54i1.1304
Gallegos, M., Razumovskiy, A., & de Castro-Peçanha, V. (2022a). Viruela símica: actualización y orientaciones. Gaceta Médica de México, 158(6). https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.22000249
Gallegos, M., Portillo, N., Martino, P., & Cervigni, M. (2022b). Long COVID-19: Rethinking mental health. Clinics, 77(100067), 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100067
Gallegos, M., Martino, P., Calandra, M., Razumovskiy, A., Portillo, N. & Cervigni, M. (2022c). Síndrome Post COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe: un llamado de atención. Revista Médica de Rosario, 88, 114-118. https://revistamedicaderosario.org/index.php/rm/article/view/190
Gallegos, M., Martino, P., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Calandra, M., Razumovskiy, A., Arias Gallegos, V., Castro Pecanha, V. & Cervigni, M. (2022d). Qué es el síndrome post COVID: definición y actualización. Gaceta Médica de México, 158(6), 442-446. https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.22000144
Hemati, S., Farhadkhani, M., Sanami, S., & Mohammadi-Moghadam, F. (2022). A review on insights and lessons from COVID-19 to the prevent of monkeypox pandemic. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 50(102441), 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102441
Kozlov M. (2022). Monkeypox goes global: why scientists are on alert. Nature, 606(7912), 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01421-8
Menezes, Y. R., & Miranda, A. B. de. (2022). Severe disseminated clinical presentation of monkeypox virus infection in an immunosuppressed patient: first death report in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 55. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0392-2022
Nakazawa, Y., Emerson, G. L., Carroll, D. S., Zhao, H., Li, Y., Reynolds, M. G., Karem, K. L., Olson, V. A., Lash, R. R., Davidson, W. B., Smith, S. K., Levine, R. S., Regnery, R. L., Sammons, S. A., Frace, M. A., Mutasim, E. M., Karsani, M. E., Muntasir, M. O., Babiker, A. A., Opoka, L., … Damon, I. K. (2013). Phylogenetic and ecologic perspectives of a monkeypox outbreak, southern Sudan, 2005. Emerging infectious diseases, 19(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1902.121220
Osterholm, M. T., & Gellin, B. (2022). Confronting 21st-century monkeypox. Science (New York, N.Y.), 377(6604), 349–349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add9651
Riccò, M., Ferraro, P., Camisa, V., Satta, E., Zaniboni, A., Ranzieri, S., Baldassarre, A., Zaffina, S., & Marchesi, F. (2022). When a neglected tropical disease goes global: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Italian physicians towards Monkeypox, preliminary results. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 7(7), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7070135
Rizk, J. G., Lippi, G., Henry, B. M., Forthal, D. N., & Rizk, Y. (2022). Prevention and treatment of Monkeypox. Drugs, 82(9), 957–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01742-y
Simpson, K., Heymann, D., Brown, C. S., Edmunds, W. J., Elsgaard, J., Fine, P., Hochrein, H., Hoff, N. A., Green, A., Ihekweazu, C., Jones, T. C., Lule, S., Maclennan, J., McCollum, A., Mühlemann, B., Nightingale, E., Ogoina, D., Ogunleye, A., Petersen, B., Powell, J., … Wapling, A. (2020). Human monkeypox - After 40 years, an unintended consequence of smallpox eradication. Vaccine, 38(33), 5077–5081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.062
Velavan, T. P., & Meyer, C. G. (2022). Monkeypox 2022 outbreak: An update. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH, 27(7), 604–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13785
Walter, K., & Malani, P. N. (2022). What Is Monkeypox?. JAMA, 328(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.10259
Contribución de autoría
ROLES |
AUTORES QUE ASUMIERON EL ROL |
Conceptualización |
Miguel Gallegos, Mauricio Cervigni, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Pablo Martino |
Curación de datos |
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León, |
Análisis formal |
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León
|
Investigación |
Miguel Gallegos, Melissa L. Morgan, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León, Marlon Elías Lobos-Rivera, Pedronel González Rodríguez, Wendy Matute Rivera, Ana María Florez, Ibeth Vergara Jaen
|
Metodología |
Miguel Gallegos, Mauricio Cervigni, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Pablo Martino |
Administración del proyecto |
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Miguel Gallegos, Mauricio Cervigni
|
Recursos |
Anastasia Razumovskiy, Melissa L. Morgan, Nelson Portillo |
Software |
Carlos Carbajal-León |
Supervisión |
Mauricio Cervigni, Melissa L. Morgan, Nelson Portillo, Carlos Carbajal-León, Marlon Elías Lobos-Rivera, Pedronel González Rodríguez, Wendy Matute Rivera, Ana María Florez, Ibeth Vergara Jaen
|
Validación |
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León |
Visualización |
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León |
Redacción – borrador original |
Miguel Gallegos, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Melissa L. Morgan, Nelson Portillo
|
Responsabilidades éticas:
Los autores declaran que en esta investigación no se realizaron experimentos con seres humanos.
Financiación:
Esta investigación no contó con financiamiento de entidades públicas y/o privadas.
Conflictos de interés:
Los autores declaran no tener conflictos de interés respecto a esta investigación.